When Creed Becomes a Badge of Superiority
There is a kind of theology that knows how to defend truth but has forgotten how to tremble before God.
It can quote Scripture, recite creeds, defend doctrine, and condemn error—yet no longer stand in awe before the living Christ. And when theology loses awe, it becomes dangerous.
Karl Barth was right to fear a theology that becomes too confident in itself.
Picture a small religious community that begins with zeal for truth. At first, its members want to honor God, study Scripture, and preserve sound doctrine. But slowly, something changes. Their creed no longer functions as a humble witness to Christ. It becomes a fence. Then a weapon. Then a badge of superiority.
Before long, the group is no longer saying, “Come and behold Christ.” It is saying, “Come and agree with us—or perish.”
That is what happens when theology loses awe.
Faithful Confession vs. Arrogant Possession
True theology should make us bow lower before God. It should make us more grateful, more humble, more patient, more merciful, and more deeply centered in Christ. But when theology becomes too confident in itself, it begins to speak about God as though God were its private property.
Of course, doctrine matters. Truth matters. Christ is not whatever we want Him to be. The church must confess, teach, discern, and warn. But there is a world of difference between faithful confession and arrogant possession.
Faithful confession says, “Jesus Christ is Lord, and we stand under His Word.”
Arrogant possession says, “Jesus Christ belongs to our system, and whoever does not fit our system is outside mercy.”
Why Theology Needs Awe
This is why awe is essential to theology. Augustine once warned, “If you comprehend, it is not God.”¹ He was not saying we cannot know God truly. He was warning us that God can never be reduced to our grasp, our formulas, our slogans, or our doctrinal pride.
Calvin made a similar point when he said that true wisdom consists in knowing God and knowing ourselves.² When we truly contemplate God, we stop flattering ourselves. We begin to see our poverty, our pride, and our need for mercy.
Barth also reminds us that theology must never separate study from prayer: “Prayer without study would be empty. Study without prayer would be blind.”³
Practicing Humility in Theology
So how do we practice humility in theology?
We read Scripture not merely to win arguments, but to let Christ correct us.
We speak of judgment with tears, not with satisfaction.
We refuse to make our denomination, movement, pastor, or theological system the final center.
We say, “I believe this deeply, but I still stand under the Word, not above it.”
We treat those who disagree with us not as enemies to crush, but as people for whom Christ died.
Witnesses, Not Owners
A theology born of awe still confesses truth. It still takes doctrine seriously. It still refuses to make Christ a mascot for human preference. But it speaks as one who has first been judged and forgiven.
That is the key.
We are not masters of the Word. We are servants under the Word.
We are not owners of Christ. We are witnesses to Christ.
A Question Worth Asking
And the moment our theology makes us proud, exclusionary, and eager to consign others to the “lake of fire and brimstone”, we should stop and ask:
Are we still standing before the crucified Lord — or are we merely defending an idol made out of our own certainty?
¹ Augustine, Sermon 117, on the incomprehensibility of God: “If you comprehend, it is not God.”
² John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book I, Chapter 1, Section 1, on the knowledge of God and the knowledge of ourselves.
³ Karl Barth, Evangelical Theology: An Introduction, on the relation between prayer and theological study: “Prayer without study would be empty. Study without prayer would be blind.”
Leave a Reply